首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   189篇
  免费   75篇
  国内免费   16篇
测绘学   7篇
大气科学   20篇
地球物理   157篇
地质学   21篇
海洋学   5篇
综合类   21篇
自然地理   49篇
  2023年   4篇
  2022年   14篇
  2021年   24篇
  2020年   11篇
  2019年   11篇
  2018年   20篇
  2017年   14篇
  2016年   6篇
  2015年   14篇
  2014年   22篇
  2013年   14篇
  2012年   13篇
  2011年   11篇
  2010年   11篇
  2009年   12篇
  2008年   11篇
  2007年   13篇
  2006年   7篇
  2005年   9篇
  2004年   11篇
  2003年   4篇
  2002年   6篇
  2000年   4篇
  1999年   3篇
  1997年   1篇
  1996年   1篇
  1994年   2篇
  1993年   1篇
  1992年   1篇
  1985年   1篇
  1983年   1篇
  1979年   2篇
  1954年   1篇
排序方式: 共有280条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
211.
本研究采用双差定位法对2014年 8月3日至7日期间鲁甸MS6.5级主震及647个余震序列进行重新定位,得到471个重定位结果.结果显示,主震的震源深度为13.3 km,与破裂过程显示的初始破裂深度较为接近,余震序列呈现出近东西向-北西向的不对称共轭状分布,近东西向长约17 km,而北西向长约22 km,小震优势分布深度为10 km以上,且由主震处沿共轭断层分别向东南向和近东西向逐渐往10 km深度以上的浅部迁移.小震分布还展示出发震断层高倾角分布,且与昭通-鲁甸断裂分支断裂包谷垴-小河断裂活动相关.由于主震破裂的质心深度可为深入认识本次地震灾害严重提供重要证据,为此我们采用gCAP(generalized Cut And Paste)方法反演了包括主震在内共5个4.0级以上地震的震源机制解,结果显示主震质心深度仅约5.0 km,与已有破裂过程显示的较大滑移量处于2~8 km之间的深度一致.本次主震错断了互为共轭的两条断裂,这种共轭破裂模式与矩心深度较浅,可能为本次地震致灾严重的重要原因.  相似文献   
212.
2012年9月7日彝良地震及余震序列双差定位研究   总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3       下载免费PDF全文
本文提出了时域多通道相关检测函数并用其计算波形互相关走时差数据,采用双差定位法对2012年9月7日云南彝良地震和余震序列共944个地震进行重定位,得到652个重定位事件,并与目录数据的结果进行了对比.本文采用了多个准则对走时差数据进行筛选,确保定位结果稳定可靠.得到MS5.7主震的震中为27.516°N,103.951°E,震源深度6.9km;MS5.6主震的震中为27.543°N,104.023°E,震源深度7.27km;重定位结果显示,地震序列紧缩为条带状并沿附近断裂走向分布,深度总体分布较重定位前变浅,集中分布在5~8km,地震群出现轻微倾斜.东西向、南北向、深度和发震时刻的平均相对误差分别为55.2 m,43.0 m,186.7 m和0.01s,走时残差16ms.研究表明:互相关数据的结果要优于目录数据;震源深度与速度模型存在较大的相关性;确定彝良—会泽断裂为本次彝良地震序列的发震构造.  相似文献   
213.
We relocated M8.0 Wenchuan earthquake and 2706 aftershocks with M≥2.0 using double-difference algorithm and obtained relocations of 2553 events. To reduce the influence of lateral variation in crustal and upper mantle velocity structure, we used different velocity models for the east and west side of Longmenshan fault zone. In the relocation process, we added seismic data from portable seismic sta-tions close to the shocks to constrain focal depths. The precisions in E-W, N-S, and U-D directions after relocation are 0.6, 0.7, and 2.5 km respectively. The relocation results show that the aftershock epi-centers of Wenchuan earthquake were distributed in NE-SW direction, with a total length of about 330 km. The aftershocks were concentrated on the west side of the central fault of Longmenshan fault zone, excluding those on the north of Qingchuan, which obviously deviated from the surface fault and passed through Pingwu-Qingchuan fault in the north. The dominant focal depths of the aftershocks are between 5 and 20 km, the average depth is 13.3 km, and the depth of the relocated main shock is 16.0 km. The depth profile reveals that focal depth distribution in some of the areas is characterized by high-angle westward dipping. The rupture mode of the main shock features reverse faulting in the south, with a large strike-slip component in the north.  相似文献   
214.
Double difference relocations of the 1402 Kachchh events (2001–2006) clearly delineate two fault zones viz. south-dipping North Wagad fault (NWF) and almost vertical Gedi fault (GF). The relocated focal depths delineate a marked variation of 4 and 7 km in the brittle-ductile transition depths beneath GF and NWF, respectively. The focal mechanism solutions of 464 aftershocks (using 8–12 first motions) show that the focal mechanisms ranged between pure reverse and pure strike-slip except for a few pure dip-slip solutions. The stress inversions performed for five rectangular zones across the Kachchh rift reveal both clockwise and anticlockwise rotation (7–32°) in the σ1 orientation within the rupture zone, favoring a heterogeneous stress regime with an average N-S fault normal compression. This rotation may be attributed to the presence of crustal mafic intrusives (5–35 km depth) in the rupture zone of the 2001 Bhuj main shock. Results suggest a relatively homogeneous stress regime in the GF zone favoring strike-slip motion, with a fault normal N-S compression.  相似文献   
215.
三峡工程移民迁建区灾害地质体改造与利用研究   总被引:12,自引:5,他引:7  
三峡工程移民迁建区地质环境复杂 ,建设用地严重不足。如何在治理的基础上对滑坡等灾害地质体开发利用是一项风险极大 ,但具非常现实意义的课题。本文论述了预应力锚拉桩在库区大型滑坡防治中的应用成果 ,这种方法不仅能有效地控制滑坡体的稳定性 ,同时 ,也能根据移民工程要求提供适宜的建设用地 ;介绍了注浆方法对库区分布较广的以崩塌、滑坡、岩溶成因为主的崩滑堆积体的改造问题 ,它不仅可以大大降低移民迁建区地基与边坡处理的工程造价 ,也为库区灾害地质体的改造提供了范例 ;弃渣是库区极为突出的环境地质问题 ,不仅危害长江 ,也对移民迁建区构成严重威胁 ,本文介绍了巫山新城等利用加筋土技术处理弃渣 ,并大大增加建设用地的实例 ,由于该挡墙高达 5 6 m,超出了一般意义下的加筋土挡墙范畴 (通常不超过 2 0 m) ,因此出现了前缘筋带断裂和面板脱落问题 ,本文介绍了应用锚管注浆技术进行面板修复的设计 ,为复杂地质条件地区高加筋挡土墙的安全修建提供了经验.  相似文献   
216.
1980—2012年河北省及邻区测震台网地震记录,使用了河北省南部及邻区(34.0°—38.0°N,112.0°—118.0°E)63个固定地震台站和4 540个地震事件,得到27 709条P波到时数据,采用速度结构与地震位置联合反演的方法,获得研究区内地壳P波三维速度结构,重新确定中小地震震源位置。速度结构揭示:研究区域内地壳的P波速度结构存在明显的横向不均匀性,在10—25 km深度上横向不均匀性更加显著;大地震基本发生在速度异常体或高低速交界区域。地震重新定位结果显示:地震P波走时均方根残差(RMS)从1.68 s降到0.82 s;地震呈明显条带状分布,震源深度与地质构造年代具有一定负相关性。  相似文献   
217.
Based on the seismic data collected from regional permanent stations and 6 temporal stations, we analyzed the seismic activity from October 2008 to July 2011 in Rongchang area. On the basis of HypoDD relocated results, we used Match&Locate method to detect and located the micro-earthquakes. We obtained the focal mechanism solutions of some earthquakes with ML ≥ 3.5 by using CAP method. Then we analyzed the temporal-spatial distribution of earthquakes and discussed the characteristics of micro-seismicity before the ML5.1 earthquake occurring on September 10, 2010. We totally detected 3 354 micro-earthquake events, which are nearly 5 times of the earthquakes in the seismic catalog issued by China Earthquake Networks Center. The magnitude of the detected events is mostly from ML-1 to 1, and the focal depth is from 2 to 4km. The magnitude-frequency analysis shows that the catalog completeness is obviously improved after adding the detected earthquakes, with the lowest magnitude decreasing from ML1.0 to 0.3. The earthquakes hypocenters are mainly clustered along faults or buried faults and in a dominant depth range consistent with the depth of injection wells, and also show a tendency of lateral extension from injection wells. The focal mechanism solutions of 9 earthquakes of ML ≥ 3.5 presented reverse faulting, as the same as the preexisting faults, indicating that earthquakes were surely related to reactivation of the faults. The strike, dip and rate of the causative faults separated in wide ranges, which indicates not only obvious changes in structure and strike of preexisting faults but also the effect of increasing pore pressure on the local stress field. Before the ML5.1 earthquake on September 10 of 2010, seismicity firstly showed clustering in time and covered the most part of the seismogenic fault in space. Then an obvious seismic quiescence occurred and lasted about 3 months. The phenomenon is consistent with the mechanism of creep sliding and resistance-uniformization along the fault zone, suggested on the basis of laboratory experiments, and it may be one of patterns of sub-instability along fault zone. However, such explanation needs to be further confirmed.  相似文献   
218.
根据2016年运城4.4级地震序列资料,进行余震精定位、主震震源机制和发震构造等研究。地震震中分布结果显示,本次地震的发生构造与以往该地区震群型地震发震构造不同,构造单元相对简单,发生在盐湖北岸断裂附近。余震双差精定位结果显示,余震优势分布呈NNE向,NW向也有零星活动。精定位后震源深度集中分布在15-24 km,平均深度20.2 km,断层剖面深度集中分布在18-23 km,倾向NW,与盆地地形构造吻合。采用Snoke与CAP方法得到的震源机制解基本一致,此次序列的主震错断方式为走滑兼逆冲,节面B参数与中条山山前断裂东段走向和倾向接近。综合认为,本次运城地震序列的余震呈NNE向优势分布,精定位结合地震震源机制结果,推断此次地震序列发震断裂为中条山山前断裂的NNE向隐伏断裂。  相似文献   
219.
We relocated a seismic swarm, which started in a mass from 31 October, 2013 in Qianguo County of Jilin Province, by using double difference location method, based on the phase data of regional digital seismic network and the crustal velocity model of Sunliao Basin. The characteristics of seismogenic fault have been investigated based on the spatial distribution image of the seismic swarm and the geophysical data near the epicenter area. The relocated epicenters of the swarm earthquakes have a precision of 0.9km in E-W, 0.7km in N-S and 1.2km in U-D direction, and show an apparent concentrated seismic belt trending N-W, with a length and width of 12km and 6km, respectively. The source depths of all events are shallow, with 80%in a range of 6~8km, and the events are apparently crowded together on the depth cross section. According to the relocated spatial distribution characteristics of the seismic swarm, the features that the medium size events happened successively, and the focal mechanism of the large size events in the swarm, we infer that the seismogenic tectonics of Qianguo seismic swarm is the thrust nappe structure inside the Keshan-Da'an fault zone. The fault plane inclines to the East direction, and is steep when close to the ground surface, which shows the typical characteristics of a listric thrust fault. The longitudinal length of the rupture plane is greater than the transverse length. According to the features of seismogenic tectonics, we infer that the three MS ≥ 5.0 earthquakes occurred at the lower layer of the thrust rupture surface of the fault, while the aftershocks were triggered by the three events and occurred mainly at the upper layer of the rupture surface.  相似文献   
220.
On 23 September 2016, two earthquakes with magnitude of M4.9 and M5.1 occurred successively near Litang city in Sichuan Province, southwestern China. These two events are located between two large-scale fault zones, i.e., the Jinshajiang and Litang faults, in the northwest of the Sichuan-Yuannan active block, eastern Tibetan plateau. Based on the phase data and waveform data from the Sichuan regional seismic network, the M4.9 and M5.0 mainshocks and 390 aftershocks have been relocated using the multi-step locating method, and the focal mechanism solutions and centroid depths for the two mainshocks were calculated by the CAP waveform inversion method. From the spatial distribution of the relocated aftershocks and fault plane solutions of the two mainshocks, combining with the seismic intensity map and tectonic setting, we suggested that the two earthquakes were generated by the E-W trending northward dipping Hagala fault. The nodal plane consistent with the strike and dip of the Hagala fault is interpreted as the coseismic rupture plane with a dip angle of 44° for both the M4.9 and M5.1 earthquakes. And we inferred that the M4.9 and M5.1 earthquakes may be resulted from the nearly E-W striking Hagala normal faulting in the upper crust between the Litang and Batang regions due to the continuous eastward extrusion of the material of the Qiangtang block in the west.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号